What's happening?

Video Sources 0 Views Report Error

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
  • Source 4123movies
  • Source 5123movies
  • Source 6123movies
  • Source 7123movies
  • Source 8123movies
The Evil of Frankenstein 1964 123movies

The Evil of Frankenstein 1964 123movies

He's never been more shocking! shocking! shocking!May. 08, 196486 Min.
Your rating: 0
9 1 vote

Synopsis

Watch: The Evil of Frankenstein 1964 123movies, Full Movie Online – Penniless, Baron Frankenstein, accompanied by his eager assistant Hans, arrives at his family castle near the town of Karlstaad, vowing to continue his experiments in the creation of life. Fortuitously finding the creature he was previously working on, he brings it back to a semblance of life but requires the services of a mesmerist, Zoltan, to successfully animate it. The greedy and vengeful Zoltan secretly sends the monster into town to steal gold and ‘punish’ the burgomaster and the chief of police, which acts lead to a violent confrontation between the baron and the townspeople..
Plot: Once hounded from his castle by outraged villagers for creating a monstrous living being, Baron Frankenstein returns to Karlstaad. High in the mountains they stumble on the body of the creature, perfectly preserved in the ice. He is brought back to life with the help of the hypnotist Zoltan who now controls the creature. Can Frankenstein break Zoltan’s hypnotic spell that incites the monster to commit these horrific murders or will Zoltan induce the creature to destroy its creator?
Smart Tags: #homecoming #experiment #small_town #robbery #stolen_property #deaf_mute_woman #exile #mind_control #pyrophobia #lynch_mob #frankenstein’s_monster #baron #creature #castle #lightning #carnival #reanimation #scientist #mad_scientist #hypnotist #electricity


Find Alternative – The Evil of Frankenstein 1964, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


Ratings:

6.0/10 Votes: 4,161
57% | RottenTomatoes
N/A | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 78 Popularity: 6.98 | TMDB

Reviews:


_**Hammer borrows from Universal to reboot the series**_

Hammer did seven Frankenstein films from 1957-1973: “The Curse of Frankenstein” (1957), “The Revenge of Frankenstein” (1958), “The Evil of Frankenstein” (1964), “Frankenstein Created Woman” (1967), “Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed” (1969), “The Horror of Frankenstein” (1970) and “Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell” (1973). Peter Cushing plays Baron Frankenstein in every one of these except “The Horror of Frankenstein” because it was a remake of the original story and they needed a much younger actor for the role

With “The Evil of Frankenstein” it had been six years since the previous installment and it reboots the series after a distribution deal made with Universal. Before this, Hammer went out of its way to make their version different from Universal (for legal reasons); here, the monster has the iconic Universal look and Dr. Frankenstein’s lab is similar to the classic one, albeit everything’s in color.

While Terence Fisher directed five of the installments, Freddie Francis does the honors here (his only directing job for Frankenstein) and I found it superior to the previous “The Revenge of Frankenstein.” Yet it’s not great like the next two entries, “Frankenstein Created Woman” and, especially, “Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed.”

The basic Frankenstein story is intact: a mad scientist from Western Europe in the late 1700s/early 1800s is obsessed with creating life from an assortment of body parts and so sets up shop in a secret lair and is successful, but the confused, grotesque creature ends up going on a killing spree. Thankfully, this one adds the entertaining village carnival element as well as the interesting involvement of a selfish hypnotist from the fair (Peter Woodthorpe). Sandor Elès plays the Baron’s assistant while Katy Wild and Caron Gardner are on hand on the feminine front.

Although people gripe about the lack of continuity with the two previous installments from 6-7 years earlier, it can be resolved with a little imagination and filling in blanks: The Baron secretly built an alternative lab at his chateau outside Karlstaad which, if you think about it, he would’ve HAD to do during the events of “Curse.” He simply omitted these clandestine undertakings from his explanation to the cleric. The flashback in this movie, told by Frankenstein to new helper Hans (Sandor Elès), is the doctor’s fixed-up version of events in Karlstaad wherein he leaves out most of the details and lies about being exiled rather than condemned to execution. Since Hans isn’t Hans Kleve from “Revenge,” he knows only what Victor wants him to know about what went down.

The movie runs 1 hour, 24 minutes and was shot at Bray Studios, just west of London.

GRADE: B

Review By: Wuchak

The Evil of Zoltan!

The Evil of Frankenstein is directed by Freddie Francis and written by John Elder. It stars Peter Cushing, Sandor Eles, Peter Woodthorpe and Katy Wild. Music is by Don Banks and cinematography by John Wilcox.

Returning back to Karlstad after a ten year absence, Baron Frankenstein (Cushing) hopes that the town has forgotten his monstrous impact on the town previously. With assistant Hans (Eles) in tow, it’s not long before the Baron stumbles upon his monster creation frozen in a glacier of ice…

Anything they don’t understand, anything that doesn’t conform to their stupid little pattern…they destroy.

With Hammer Films finally getting friendly with Universal Pictures, The Evil of Frankenstein forgets the two previous Hammer Frankenstein movies and goes for what is in all essence a rehash of Karloff’s stomping days. That’s not necessarily a bad thing if one can judge the film as a standalone movie? But creativity is sparse and it’s left to the cast and technical department to create an above average Frankenstein movie.

Yep, it sure does look nice, with impressive costuming and well dressed sets, it’s a Hammer movie for sure. Bank’s score is also classic Hammer strains. Cushing gives his usual dose of quality, though he is a touch restrained here in terms of committed emotion, and you have to smile at his James Bond moment during one getaway scene while a buxom babe looks on with kinky lustation in her eyes. Elsewhere it’s a safe turn of cast performances, with future Dad of Delboy Trotter, Woodthorpe, camping it up as the scheming and revenge fuelled hypnotist Zoltan, Wild isn’t asked to do much, and neither is Eles, who seems to be in it for some continental flavour. Francis is no Terence Fisher, but he has a good visual flair and he can construct a very good action sequence, such as the excellent finale here.

There’s problems for sure; familiarity of Frankenstein movies in general hurts, the make up for the creature is very poor, one back screen projection sequence is very cheap even by low grade Hammer standards, while some of the Baron’s reactions to situations don’t bear up to logical scrutiny. It’s not hard to understand why it’s a very divisive movie amongst the Hammer Horror faithful. Yet its merits hold up well and it never once sags or becomes tiring. Cushing, Wilcox and that finale ensure it’s a decent night in by the fire. 6.5/10

Review By: John Chard
The antipathy for this film has always baffled me
Arguably the weakest entry in the series, “The Evil of Frankenstein” is still a hell of a lot of fun to watch. Peter Cushing, the elder statesman of English horror films, turns in a particularly vigorous performance as the relentlessly demonized Baron Victor Frankenstein, while Peter Woodthorpe is excellent as the sulky, sleazy stage hypnotist who gains control of Frankenstein’s resurrected creature (Kiwi Kingston). Sure, there’s a heavy reliance on formula, but this is a series of films about a doctor who creates misshapen monsters and animates them with electricity, after all. What is the actual difference between a critically acclaimed movie like “The Revenge of Frankenstein” and a ‘bad’ movie like this one? Is the distinction as sharp as you’ve been led to believe?

Ultimately I have to judge films–especially genre pictures–according to whether or not I find them enjoyable, and I’ve been enjoying this one for decades. When was the last time you saw a horror movie as competent (if unspectacular) as “The Evil of Frankenstein”? The fact that it’s regarded as a lesser installment in Hammer’s Frankenstein franchise merely underscores the high standard of the studio’s output. Forget the critical potshots and allow yourself to be entertained 🙂

Review By: InjunNose
Possibly the least out of the series but it’s still entertaining, especially for fans of course.
Out of the long running Frankenstein-series from the Hammer Studio’s, starring Peter Cushing, this movie might very well be the least one. For the fans of the series and Hammer movies in general it still remains a more than good watch though. It’s entertaining, especially if you’re into these type of movies and it of course has Peter Cushing in it to spice up some things as well.

What makes this movie not as good as the other ones from the series is its story and approach. It just doesn’t pick a very interesting story, that somehow involves hypnoses. Of course it’s quite difficult to come up with something original each time for every Frankenstein movie by the Hammer Studio’s but that doesn’t mean you can just get away with putting in some new original stuff when it just simply doesn’t work out too well for the story. Luckily the movie starts to become more ‘Hammer-like’ toward its ending, when the monsters gets on the loose again and causing death and mayhem, as usual.

The movie of course doesn’t feature a lot of horror and mostly has to settle with its atmosphere. The movie has a typical Hammer look and feeling all over it. The movie its look is almost pathetically cheap at times but this is part of what makes Hammer movies such charming ones to watch.

Peter Cushing is good as always as the well known baron but you also feel that he just didn’t had the best material to work with. He doesn’t always control his character well enough it seems, which can be blamed on the movie its writing. Director Freddie Francis also does his usual stuff, with his first and only Frankenstein movie he directed for the Hammer studio’s Frankenstein-series, though he also later did some movies which involved the baron and creature, such as for instance “Son of Dracula”.

It’s not the best the series has to offer but for the fans this still simply remains a must-see!

7/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

Review By: Boba_Fett1138

Other Information:

Original Title The Evil of Frankenstein
Release Date 1964-05-08
Release Year 1964

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 24 min (84 min)
Budget 0
Revenue 0
Status Released
Rated Unrated
Genre Horror
Director Freddie Francis
Writer Anthony Hinds
Actors Peter Cushing, Peter Woodthorpe, Duncan Lamont
Country United Kingdom
Awards 1 nomination
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Mono (RCA Sound Recording)
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera N/A
Laboratory N/A
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm

The Evil of Frankenstein 1964 123movies
The Evil of Frankenstein 1964 123movies
The Evil of Frankenstein 1964 123movies
The Evil of Frankenstein 1964 123movies
Original title The Evil of Frankenstein
TMDb Rating 6.135 78 votes

Similar titles

XX 2017 123movies
Minority Report 2002 123movies
Ice Road Killer 2022 123movies
Mantera 2012 123movies
Human Lost 2019 123movies
Wishmaster 4: The Prophecy Fulfilled 2002 123movies
Dante’s Inferno: An Animated Epic 2010 123movies
Left Bank 2008 123movies
Clinger 2015 123movies
Nefarious 2021 123movies
A Blood Pledge 2009 123movies
7 Below 2012 123movies