Moneyball 2011 123movies

Watch: Moneyball 2011 123movies, Full Movie Online – Oakland A’s GM Billy Beane is handicapped with the lowest salary constraint in baseball. If he ever wants to win the World Series, Billy must find a competitive advantage. Billy is about to turn baseball on its ear when he uses statistical data to analyze and place value on the players he picks for the team..
Plot: The story of Oakland Athletics general manager Billy Beane’s successful attempt to put together a baseball team on a budget, by employing computer-generated analysis to draft his players.
Smart Tags: #baseball #strategy #statistics #sabermetrics #timeframe_2000s #year_2002 #baseball_movie #job_offer #winning_streak #major_league_baseball #oakland_athletics #based_on_true_story #slow_motion_scene #voice_over_narration #car #u.s._car #dodge_motor_vehicle #dodge_ram #baseball_sport #docudrama_drama #timeframe_1970s

Find Alternative – Moneyball 2011, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	7.6/10 Votes: 424,355
	94% | RottenTomatoes
	87/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 4239 Popularity: 23.531 | TMDB

Reviews:

BORING watch, won’t watch again, and do not recommend unless you’re both a baseball and a statistics or financial business fan.

With Jonah Hill, Chris Pratt, Brad Pitt, and Philip Seymore Hoffman, I thought it would at least be interesting if not entertaining.

As the movie begins and it is clearly about Baseball, I at least hoped it would be done in a fun entertaining way. I guess Jonah Hill got tired of being stereo-typed as “fun”.

I know 1 guy that would probably get great pleasure out of this movie as a fan of baseball statistics, and if I didn’t know about that 1 guy, I wouldn’t have any clue why this movie was made.

I can’t express this enough: this movie is about cold hard numbers and how they can be manipulated to impact real people in the world of baseball.

**A good behind-the-scenes movie about baseball.**

In general, sports-themed movies are not strictly my piece of cake, I prefer to see other things. But this film already had an interesting list of award nominations, which includes six Oscars (Best Film, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Actor, Best Supporting Actor, Best Editing and Best Sound Mixing) and three BAFTA, with in none of these cases it came out victorious. And the truth is that there are a lot of very good films in which the theme is sport.

The theme of this film is quite simple and, however, very well-used: the director of a medium-sized baseball team finds himself in the need to recruit new players and, to a certain extent, compete on an equal footing with stronger teams. and with more money in their pockets to spend. In order to balance things out, he rethinks the entire team’s strategy, from the way they recruit and evaluate players to what goes on the pitch. Therefore, it is a movie about baseball, but with very little action and game played, which is not exactly what sports movie fans prefer. I personally liked it, because it gives us an idea of ​​what goes on behind the scenes of these high competition teams, in the offices and in the dressing room. And it was interesting to see how math, statistics and number analysis can be decisive in choosing certain players and game strategies. A subject of little interest, which seems dry and too technical, has thus become an excellent screenplay.

Brad Pitt is a good actor and uses all his charisma and presence in this film. The actor is able to lead and guide us through the entire film and ensures a very satisfactory performance throughout the entire production. Also, Jonah Hill does a pretty good job as a creative mathematician who seems to be in the least likely position for a numbers man. On the other hand, I didn’t particularly like Seymour Hoffman’s work on this film. I think the actor was not given material to match his abilities and had little screen time and very little to do. So it’s not the actor’s fault…

The direction of Bennett Miller does a generally decent job, and ensures a very good pace to the film, with a dynamism that prevents the film from falling into the doldrums. The cinematography is very sharp, dynamic and colorful, and the sets are very good, especially the countryside and the bathhouses, with all the details. The sound effects are quite good, and the soundtrack is discreet but competent.

More than a game of numbers
It has long been said that professional sports are more a game of politics than an actual game. Major League Baseball is not just a game of money, but in “Moneyball” it’s a game of numbers versus a game of people. It’s callousness at its highest when general managers trade away people as if they’re objects with little regard for them or their family. Brad Pitt as Billy Beane, the GM of the Oakland As, seems to take that even further, treating people as if they are only numbers, and yet there was something refreshing and humanistic about the whole thing.

It’s 2001 and Oakland has just lost to the New York Yankees in the playoffs, not surprising, seeing as their payroll was 76 Million dollars less. The humour of “Moneyball” starts in the off-season when the team can’t afford to keep their top players and Beane and his experienced scouts start tossing around some free agent ideas. One guy is no good because he frequents strip clubs too often, another guy is no good because his girlfriend is ugly, and on down the list they go. But then Beane meets Yale-educated, economics-, mathematics-, and computer-whiz, baseball fan, Peter Brand (Jonah Hill). He has no experience and he doesn’t know these players. He doesn’t know if they stand funny or if they swing ugly. He only knows their stats and their salary.

A lot of people took offense to Beane’s approach of degrading players down to the sum total of their on-base percentage and runs-in potential. But I liked it. Since the game of baseball isn’t changing any time soon and players will always just be elements that can help win games and make more money, why not view them as numbers rather than as people with ugly girlfriends? Like Peter Brand, I like numbers.

It’s a movie about doing more with less, so I think we’re just supposed to ignore the irony that they needed an excessively high budget to make it. In fact, it cost Sony Pictures more money to make this movie than it cost the Oakland A’s to field their entire team for a season. Oh well, only one lesson for Hollywood at a time, and I still liked the movie.

For a movie about people trying to change the game of baseball, it’s only fitting that they are changing the sports genre. This isn’t about the team and how many games they’re going to win. As in all cases, they win some and they lose some. And we really only meet one player, the rest are just names thrown in the air. The movie is about Billy Beane, a real person, and a multi-dimensional character. At first he realizes that he is going to have to play the game with more than just money, and then after he makes it about numbers too, he finds a balanced statistical and personal concept.

“Moneyball” says that the game is about money, but the movie is about people. Writer Aaron Sorkin knows how to write people, and as evidenced by “The Social Network” (2010), he also knows how to turn computer-programming into riveting cinema. We find humour in the least-expected of places, we find heart in the least-expected of people, and ‘Moneyball” gives us a completely enjoyable movie that becomes so much more than numbers.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 13 min (133 min)
Budget 50000000
Revenue 110206216
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Biography, Drama, Sport
Director Bennett Miller
Writer Steven Zaillian, Aaron Sorkin, Stan Chervin
Actors Brad Pitt, Robin Wright, Jonah Hill
Country United States
Awards Nominated for 6 Oscars. 29 wins & 82 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital, Datasat, SDDS
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera Arriflex 435 ES, Panavision Primo Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision Primo Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Platinum, Panavision Primo Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA, Sony ColorWorks, Culver City (CA), USA (digital intermediate) (as ColorWorks)
Film Length 3,644 m (Portugal)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision3 250D 5207, Vision3 500T 5219)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format), Spherical (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema