Lost in Space 1998 123movies

Watch: Lost in Space 1998 123movies, Full Movie Online – In the year 2058, the Earth will soon be uninhabitable after the irreversible effects of pollution and global warming! Professor John Robinson, lead scientist of the Jupiter 2 Mission, will lead his family to the habitable planet Alpha Prime to prep it for colonization. The Jupiter 2 is equipped with a hyperdrive that allows faster-than-light travel, which will eventually be employed to evacuate the citizens of Earth. However hypergates must be constructed on Earth and Alpha Prime to provide stable points of departure and arrival. Dr. Zachary Smith is bribed by a terrorist organization to sabotage the mission, and ends up an unwilling stowaway as the ship blasts off..
Plot: The prospects for continuing life on Earth in the year 2058 are grim. So the Robinsons are launched into space to colonize Alpha Prime, the only other inhabitable planet in the galaxy. But when a stowaway sabotages the mission, the Robinsons find themselves hurtling through uncharted space.
Smart Tags: #spaceship #robot #alien #sabotage #scientist #family_relationships #based_on_tv_series #pilot #surrealism #portal #warp_speed #cameo #artificial_intelligence #child_genius #little_boy #time_freeze #professor #cgi #futuristic #cult_film #electronic_music_score

Find Alternative – Lost in Space 1998, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	5.2/10 Votes: 72,860
	28% | RottenTomatoes
	42/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 1039 Popularity: 20.156 | TMDB

Reviews:

Uninteresting shallow science-fiction flick.
This remake of the successful ’60’s television show really is a waste of some good potential. It by no means is an horrible movie but the script isn’t really interesting or spectacular and the character treatment is quite poor.

In a way this movie is a mixed bag. On the one hand it has some good actors in it and some of the special effects are really good but than again on the other hand the story is pretty shallow, the costumes are embarrassingly dreadful and some of the special effects are below average at best. Sounds weird, a movie that has both good and bad special effects in it. It’s a bit weird, it’s like they spend most of the time on the big special effects shots and after that they raffled the rest of the special effects. At times the movie is impressive to watch and at other moments it’s just laughable bad to look at. Such as the CG character Blarp. He (or she?) looked absolutely dreadful and it made the movie even more ridiculous and bad to watch. But perhaps worst thing about the entire character is that it’s a totally, completely unnecessary one that doesn’t add anything to the story at all.

The movie has a solid cast. John Hurt certainly adds some believability to the silly moments in the movie and he deliverers some of the bad dialog good and even credible. Gary Oldman is of course also a great actor but he plays a bit of an uninteresting villain in this movie that doesn’t get enough opportunity to shine. Matt LeBlanc is most of the time convincing in his role but he at times deliver some cheesy dialog which doesn’t always make him believable as a tough space pilot. Mimi Rogers and Heather Graham also walk around in the movie but they get very little interesting to do. Good in her role was also Lacey Chabert. She’s a good young actress, never really understood why she didn’t appeared in more mainstream big Hollywood productions. She’s an actress with great potential but somehow Hollywood never really picked this up. Maybe it has something to do with the failure of this movie?

Because yes, this movie is a bit of a failure. Not only in terms of how well it did at the box office and how well it was received by the crowd and critics but also certainly in terms of how the movie is constructed. The script is just disappointingly shallow and has some totally unlikely and unbelievable events in it, that at times don’t even make sense. The story also uses too many elements from the first Star Wars trilogy and even a little bit from “2001: A Space Odyssey”. It doesn’t only uses story elements from that movies, it also rips off the looks of some of the spaceships, planets and city skylights. No, “Lost in Space” certainly isn’t the most original science-fiction movie ever made.

The movie also lacks some good tension and action sequences. There are too many slow moments in the movie in which totally nothing happens. It’s OK to have some slower moments in a movie but only when the script and characters are good and interesting enough to carry those slower moments. In this movie that really isn’t the case.

This movie is not a complete disaster and the 4.6 rating here at the moment might be a bit too harsh. The movie does provide some good and entertaining moments. But if only the movie had a better and more original script, than this movie perhaps would had been a bigger success and certainly a better one to watch.

5/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 10 min (130 min)
Budget 80000000
Revenue 136159423
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Adventure, Family
Director Stephen Hopkins
Writer Irwin Allen, Akiva Goldsman
Actors Gary Oldman, William Hurt, Matt LeBlanc
Country United Kingdom, United States
Awards 3 wins & 17 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix DTS, Dolby Digital, SDDS
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Panavision Panaflex Millennium, Panavision Primo, C- and E-Series Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA (prints), Rank Film Laboratories, Denham, UK (also prints)
Film Length 3,565 m (Sweden)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision 500T 5279, Eastman EXR 200T 5293)
Cinematographic Process Panavision (anamorphic), Super 35 (visual effects)
Printed Film Format 35 mm