Watch: Jurassic World 2015 123movies, Full Movie Online – Twenty-two years after the original Jurassic Park failed, the new park, also known as Jurassic World, is open for business. After years of studying genetics, the scientists on the park genetically engineer a new breed of dinosaur, the Indominus Rex. When everything goes horribly wrong, will our heroes make it off the island?.
Plot: Twenty-two years after the events of Jurassic Park, Isla Nublar now features a fully functioning dinosaur theme park, Jurassic World, as originally envisioned by John Hammond.
Smart Tags: #dinosaur #velociraptor #theme_park #disaster_film #experiment_gone_wrong #aquarium #helicopter_crash #jurassic_park #pig #island #chase #jeep #close_up_of_eyes #cell_phone #bazooka #monster_movie #gasoline #monorail #jumping_into_river #forest #teenage_love
123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day
6.9/10 Votes: 643,022 | |
71% | RottenTomatoes | |
59/100 | MetaCritic | |
N/A Votes: 18601 Popularity: 66.066 | TMDB |
Most assuredly the best sequel to _Jurassic Park_, but it doesn’t touch the original. “Not being as good as a different movie” is not what’s bad about _Jurassic World_ though, what is though is the dropped plotlines, unlikeable characters, haphazard mixing of respect and disrespect for the original at random intervals, a **complete** lack of chemistry between any two characters whatsoever, but most of all the romantic leads, underdeveloped arcs of both characters and story, more Deus Ex Machinas than you can shake a stick at, and some of the most painful dialogue I’ve seen in a Hollywood flick all year.But there’s Bryce Dallas Howard proving (when given the chance) she’s an acting force, which was a particularly pleasant surprise given that the last thing I saw her in was _Spider-Man 3_. Chris Pratt doesn’t for a moment make you believe he is anyone other than Chris Pratt, but Chris Pratt is a pretty rad dude so that’s more or less a chip in the film’s favour.
It also has dinosaurs, so there’s that.
_Final rating: ★★½ – Had a lot that appealed to me, didn’t quite work as a whole._
Untamable Devil.One thing that would be 100% guaranteed prior to the release of Jurassic World, is that whatever the quality, or lack of, the notices would be mixed. Thus the reactions would be akin to those that “Indiana Jones 4” received, charges of ruining childhoods and franchises etc.
Jurassic World does exactly what is expected of it, it’s a popcorn blockbuster that plays out as mindless fun, complete with outstanding effects, monster mayhem and moments of dumbness. In fact it’s very much a safe sequel, reverting to the original formula without the classy edges of Spielberg’s deft touch.
There’s a likable cast fronting up the pic, with Chris Pratt as the hero carrying some olde adventure chops about him, and Bryce Dallas Howard (her natural beauty sparkling on Blu-ray) a fun femme side-kick. The writers introduce a couple of new mighty monsters to the series, hell of beasties for sure, while the photography, stunt work and musical score all impress greatly.
The Velociraptor plot line is crummy and daft, almost as daft as Bryce’s high heels character arc, and the familiarity factor does grate a little at times, but it’s a rollicking good time not to be taken remotely seriously like it’s some sort of series disgrace. 7/10
A nod to the original and even more
As a young boy, dinosaurs were the greatest thing on earth (well, the greatest thing that once WAS on earth) for me. I knew most of their names (like Gray in JW) and had my plastic dinosaurs fighting themselves, evil, and sometimes also good. You can imagine my excitement when I first saw Jurassic Park and I was truly blown away by the idea. I still somehow wish that I could actually experience the events in the movie, although I understand the critic that the author of the novel, Michael Crichton, wanted to express. Much of that critic is lost in the third sequel to the original movie, 22 years after its original release, at least it’s hidden very deep in the plot. The scientists have created a new super- species, filled the missing pieces of DNA up with genes of amphibians that all have certain survival-powers, and it all goes terribly wrong, much because the dinosaurs are being underestimated as they always were. So is it a reboot of the first movie? At least a bit. They are referring to the first movie all the time, examples: A control guy wearing an Jurassic Park shirt proudly says he got an original shirt (shown in part 1 several times) for $150 from eBay, they run through degenerated original buildings and one time the kids even drive an original van that they repaired competently. New park-owner Masrani says that John Hammond told him on his death bed to “spare no expense”, which was one of the funniest scenes in the movie, yet Masrani doesn’t want to commercialize the park too much. That’s where the movie starts being perfectly self-ironic: one control guy (the one with the classic shirt) jokingly suggests, in order to please the investors, to name newly bred species after companies, “so how about Pepsi-Saurus”? The movie indeed is full of product placements, I counted at least 9 brands and logos that are shown or mentioned during the film. So what is the purpose of the movie? Mainly, I guess, it’s meant as a nostalgic, yet up-to-date experience/excuse for all those fans who were bitterly disappointed by the Parts II&III. It’s exciting, contains a little love story, it’s got wit, social criticism and excellently animated dinosaurs. It shows that 22 years after Jurassic Park, movie heroes are still being chauvinist and women are still stronger and braver as they are pictured in most (other) movies. And, finally, it fulfills every fans biggest desire: man and dinosaur, at last fighting side by side. That’s probably why I’d give it an even better rating than the original Jurassic Park movie, although of course classic scenes like the shaking water glass will probably never be outperformed. Résumé: Director Colin Trevorrow manages to create an enthralling and visually stunning homage to the original which at some points brilliantly steps out of the shadow of its role model and finally puts the conciliatory end to the dinosaur universe that we, the fans, truly deserved.
The franchise has had a lobotomy
Dinosaurs. Amusement Park. Tourists. Disaster.Jurassic World has them all.
Naturally, I had to see it.
The beginning holds much promise, and it gets your hopes up for the disaster to come. When it does, there are some great action sequences, especially ones with the glass ball containing the soft, chewy child centre.
Unfortunately the final act unravels into outright farce.
Chris Pratt is great as the affable yet bad-ass Raptor Whisperer. He’s got an easy going charisma that could easily carry an iconic character like Indiana Jones.
Bryce Dallas Howard plays Claire Dearing, the uptight park manager, who initially clashes with the laid back Owen. Of course you know where the tension goes.
The film tries to flesh out Claire’s character by throwing in her two nephews (someone and another kid), who do double duty as McGuffins.
Vincent D’Onofrio shows up as Hoskins, a villainous representative of the military-industrial complex angling to weaponize velociraptors. He’s all sneers and scenery chewing, so obviously evil he’s got a goatee. D’Onofrio does it well but the evil plan he’s been saddled with by the writers makes no sense at all.
The director, Colin Trevorrow, said in interviews that he wanted the dinosaurs to act like real animals, not cartoon monsters. Quelle surprise! I had no idea, as he has well-fed winged dinos (or near enough to dinos) go on a crazed orgy of violence against hapless tourists. Why? Because cool action sequence!
One poor soul is even treated to the most outlandishly elongated death sequence I’ve ever seen, all to no end. It didn’t justify anything, paid nothing back, offered no comeuppance. It was just gleeful indulgence in sadistic torture of a minor character. It was an Itchy & Scratchy moment.
Which brings us to the final act: turn off your brain before it begins.
The first movie proved you could have a smart script and dinosaurs in the same movie. After that, the IQ of the series dropped with each outing. The first one had chaos theory and amber and DNA extraction and cleverness up the whazoo. It was AWESOME.
What does this one have? Hackneyed evil plans, a clunky plot, and characters so smart they run from T-Rex’s in high heels.
The franchise has had a lobotomy.
Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 4 min (124 min)
Budget 150000000
Revenue 1671713208
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Director Colin Trevorrow
Writer Rick Jaffa, Amanda Silver, Colin Trevorrow
Actors Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Ty Simpkins
Country United States
Awards 15 wins & 58 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A
Sound Mix Dolby Digital, Datasat, Dolby Surround 7.1, SDDS, Auro 11.1, DTS (DTS: X) (4K UHD release), IMAX 6-Track, DTS (Blu-ray release), 12-Track Digital Sound (IMAX version), Sonics-DDP (IMAX version)
Aspect Ratio 2.00 : 1
Camera Arriflex 235, Panavision Primo Lenses, Arriflex 435, Panavision Primo Lenses, Panavision 65 HR Camera, Panavision System 65 Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision Primo Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Platinum, Panavision Primo Lenses, Red Epic Dragon, Fujinon Premier Cabrio Lenses (aerial shots)
Laboratory Company 3, Los Angeles (CA), USA (digital intermediate), FotoKem Laboratory, Burbank (CA), USA (film processing) (prints)
Film Length (7 reels)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision3 200T 5213, Vision3 500T 5219), 65 mm (Kodak Vision3 50D 5203, Vision3 200T 5213), Redcode RAW
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Panavision Super 70 (source format) (some scenes), Redcode RAW (6K) (source format) (aerial shots), Super 35 (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (spherical) (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema (also 3-D version)