Watch: First Knight 1995 123movies, Full Movie Online – After King Arthur of Camelot has fought several wars which has led to peace and justice for his land, he is turning his attention to thoughts of marriage, his chosen one being Lady Guinevere, who has become head of neighboring Leonesse following the death of her father. Peace and justice for Arthur and Guinevere are short lived as Prince Malagant, one of the knights of the round table, wants Camelot for himself and King Arthur deposed. Many in the land follow Malagant, whose quest also involves marauding Leonesse. As the King’s betrothed, Guinevere becomes Malagant’s target in achieving both of his goals. Meanwhile, Lancelot is a free-living peasant who often makes his way through life by demonstrations of his sword fighting prowess. His skill is largely due to his ability to assess his opponents, and not fear dying. On Malagant’s first attempt at abducting Guinevere, Lancelot, by happenstance, is there to save her. He falls in love with her at first sight. Although attracted to the man who saved her, Guinevere cannot think of any other man in the lead up to her marriage to Arthur. Because of his attraction to Guinevere, Lancelot becomes involved in the battles between Malagant and Arthur in Lancelot doing whatever needed to keep Guinevere safe. As these battles brew and as Arthur becomes indebted to Lancelot for saving Guinevere at the possible expense of his own life, Guinevere cannot help but fall for Lancelot, resulting in a romantic triangle comprised of Arthur, Guinevere and Lancelot, a triangle of which Arthur is unaware..
Plot: The timeless tale of King Arthur and the legend of Camelot are retold in this passionate period drama. Arthur is reluctant to hand the crown to Lancelot, and Guinevere is torn between her loyalty to her husband and her growing love for his rival. But Lancelot must balance his loyalty to the throne with the rewards of true love.
Smart Tags: #based_on_legend #love_triangle #arthurian_legend #king_arthur_character #warlord #horse #love #hostage #rescue #heroism #bravery #courage #castle #great_britain #medieval_times #knight #battle #marriage #knights_of_the_round_table #camelot #excalibur
123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day
6.0/10 Votes: 74,206 | |
43% | RottenTomatoes | |
57/100 | MetaCritic | |
N/A Votes: 1001 Popularity: 12.177 | TMDB |
**I really like this movie, but it’s a terrible movie.**This film is, for me, particularly nostalgic because I really enjoyed watching it in my childhood and youth. It was one of those films that marked my imagination about the Middle Ages, and how it could have been. Obviously, the way I see it has changed with maturity, and studies have allowed me to perceive the enormous anachronisms committed by this film, on several levels. However, like almost everything that brings us good childhood memories, it is a film that continues to be very dear to me.
The screenplay does not deserve much consideration, being essentially a poor melodrama of questionable taste, created around the Arthurian legends. The legend, as we know, has a strong Frankish origin, and centers on a legendary king who ruled over Britannia, defending it from the Saxons, in a very early period of the High Middle Ages – yes, because the Middle Ages cannot be considered as a whole, it is practically a thousand years long and a lot has happened in that time. We see a Lady Guinevere enter into a marriage of political convenience with an aging King Arthur, at the height of his power and influence, even though threatened by the host of an enemy, Malagant. And we see how an arrogant young Lancelot pursues, and in effect harasses, the young queen, seducing her and causing her to fall in love with him.
Despite the affection I have for this film, which brings me so many good memories, I recognize that it is a weak and poorly made film. The story itself that is told to us is quite ugly, being, in essence, a moral tale of seduction, betrayal, adultery and abuse of trust, where the only character worthy of our sympathy is old King Arthur, in his excess of goodness, sense of justice and righteousness. Even though he is an old man, he honors his word to his bride’s father and marries her (obviously a woman much younger than he is) to protect her and her feudal lordship. Committed to building an ideal kingdom, he ostracizes Malagant, who disbelieves in the project due to his own ambition and cruelty, just as he cannot see how he opens himself up to Lancelot, a total stranger, creating conditions for Lancelot to abuse him and betray him, seducing the young and ungrateful queen. A very ugly story, but one of strong humanity, where we learn what happens when we are too good.
Despite only appearing to us almost half an hour after the film has started, there is no doubt that Sean Connery is the great actor in this film. He was just the man to bestow strength and nobility on the old British sovereign. Moreover, his charismatic and aristocratic presence, and the impeccable way in which he acts and works his character, is reason enough to justify a revisit to this film, which has become quite popular on television. However, the rest of the cast is totally wrong. Either the actors weren’t able to understand the characters, or (and I bet that was it) director Jerry Zucker was totally incapable of directing them and understanding how he should do it. Julia Ormond is very beautiful and elegant, but she doesn’t seem to know what she’s doing in this movie. Ben Cross is a shadow of himself and makes for an absurdly poorly written and poorly conceived character. Richard Gere is pompous, smug, braggart, irritating and perverse.
Production values are high, and the film looks expensive. The cinematography is incredible and very beautiful, especially the night scenes, with torchlight and fire. The sets and costumes are very detailed, elaborate and visually impressive. The weapons and armor of Arthur’s knights, with the blue and silver, are beautiful, and Camelot is one of the most beautiful medieval scenic cities I’ve ever seen in a movie. The big problem with this is that we are seeing a blatant anachrony! If the film addresses the figure of King Arthur and that king existed sometime before the Year A Thousand, the city of Camelot would never have that elaborate visual aspect. Weapons and armor, likewise, would be much more primitive, simple and functional. It’s all very nice, no doubt about it, but it’s fake like the kiss of Judas! One more word for the soundtrack, which is a bit vulgar and dubious in taste, almost melodramatic.
OK. First things first; this deviates substantially from any of the other depictions of Arthurian legend, so if you’re looking for anything akin to the films (or books) you’ve come across before, then I’d stop now. If you’re looking for a light and fluffy costume romance, then you might salvage something from it yet, though. Julia Ormond (Guinevere) is travelling to meet Sean Connery (King Arthur) with a view to marrying him and thus saving her beleaguered land of Leonesse from the frequent invasions of the evil “Malagant” (Ben Cross). On her way, though, she is attacked and only saved by the cunning wit and bravery of travelling swordsman Lancelot (Richard Gere). She is delivered safely to her beau, only to encounter Lancelot again as he wins the most lethal obstacle course known to man – and he gets his kiss! The remainder of the film dips in and out of the legend – she falls in love; gets kidnapped and there are as many shades of “Robin Hood” as there are of “Knights of the Round Table” as our intrepid Lancelot tries to keep her, and the kingdom safe. Cross isn’t exactly menacing as the baddie, but Connery is quite good giving an impression of a king who can’t believe his luck, and Ormond and Gere have a certain chemistry as their affair blossoms. The ending isn’t up to much, though – perhaps if the knights had spent less time in front of the mirror, they may have made for better soldiers – and I thought the whole thing missed the characterisation of Merlin (the most interesting character of these legends, I thought). The look of the film is mischievous, colourful and breezy, and it’s a decent if slightly cheesy and unremarkable family film that does what it says on the tin.
First Knight Is First Class
A very pleasing all-around movie is how I found this Knights Of The Roundtable-type story and a good one for DVD, even one that’s been on disc for quite some time. For an early DVD, this was a real treat for the ears with some great rear- speaker sound. The story, however, not the sound, was the main appeal of this film for me.The three main stars in this movie were very appealing: Richard Gere as the cocky-but-good guy Sir Lancelot; Julia Ormond as Guinevere and Sean Connery, aptly cast as King Arthur. He certainly looks and acts the part, as does Ben Cross as the villain, Prince Malagant.
This is a straight adventure story, too, with none of the hocus-pocus sorcery baloney who often see in these King Arthur stories. This is beautifully filmed with a city of Camelot that is awesome to view. Nice values in here, too, with – gasp – the importance of prayer mentioned. No wonder so many reviewers out there hated this message.
This is simply a classy, great adventure and highly recommend to literally everyone who values a nice story that has values.
Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 14 min (134 min)
Budget 55000000
Revenue 127600435
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Adventure, Drama
Director Jerry Zucker
Writer Lorne Cameron, David Hoselton, William Nicholson
Actors Sean Connery, Richard Gere, Julia Ormond
Country United States, United Kingdom
Awards N/A
Production Company N/A
Website N/A
Sound Mix SDDS, Dolby SR, Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera Arriflex 535, Zeiss Standard Speed, Super Speed and Cooke Varotal Lenses
Laboratory Technicolor, Hollywood (CA), USA (prints)
Film Length 3,666 m (Sweden), 3,584 m
Negative Format 35 mm (Eastman EXR 500T 5298)
Cinematographic Process Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm