What's happening?

Video Sources 0 Views Report Error

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
  • Source 4123movies
  • Source 5123movies
  • Source 6123movies
  • Source 7123movies
  • Source 8123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies

Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies

Once brothers, now enemies.Dec. 03, 2014150 Min.
Your rating: 0
9 1 vote

Synopsis

Watch: Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies, Full Movie Online – Biblical epic Exodus: Gods and Kings stars Christian Bale as Moses who, as the film opens, fights alongside his brother Ramses (a shaved-headed Joel Edgerton), to help defend Egypt, which is ruled by their father, Seti (John Turturro). During battle, Moses saves Ramses life, causing Ramses to fear that his brother will one day be King because it fits with a prophecy handed down by one of Seti’s trusted spiritualists. Soon after Seti’s death, Moses, who is actually Jewish and not Egyptian, is banished. However, he becomes the leader of the Jewish people and leads a rebellion, with the help of a wrathful God, against that Egyptians…
Plot: The defiant leader Moses rises up against the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses, setting 400,000 slaves on a monumental journey of escape from Egypt and its terrifying cycle of deadly plagues.
Smart Tags: #moses #pharaoh #plague #egypt #exodus #sibling_rivalry #old_testament #well #battle #act_of_god #epic #tribe #general #destruction #tidal_wave #tornado #shepherd #sheep #lamb #marriage_ceremony #husband_wife_relationship


Find Alternative – Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


Ratings:

6.0/10 Votes: 169,812
30% | RottenTomatoes
52/100 | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 4049 Popularity: 52.609 | TMDB

Reviews:


This is a well known story and I have also seen the ’56 movie ‘The Ten Commandments’. So in this film could not foresee the modification, but it did in a slight manner like the later ‘Noah’ movie. The best part was the visuals, the graphics were so good, hard to resist the pleasure if you are vfx geek like me. That’s the reason I love modern movie, especially remake of a classic like ‘King Kong’. The problem in this flick was lie in the story telling.

As we know, Ridley Scott is an excellent narrator, but this movie was too short even though it ran 150 minutes. I felt it was just a brief, I mean there were no details or depth in the important scenes. You will know what I’m saying if you had watched ’56 movie I mentioned in a above paragraph. That’s drawback for the first timers at a same time advantage for not to fall in boredom for those who have already seen other versions. Christian Bale, awesome; Joel Edgerton, good; Ben Kingsley, never required; Aaron Paul, totally waste.

Overall, not cleverly stablised in the scenes that are very important, especially the final one about ten commandments should have been extended a little bit with a moral message. If it was a Peter Jackson movie, definitely it would have been a trilogy with an aggregated time of over 500 minutes. This movie was an entertainer like I enjoyed it than the message deliverer. Must be watched for the amusement and for the pleasure in updating technical aspect of the narration rather than inspiration.

7.5/10

Review By: Reno

This movie was rather disappointing as far as I am concerned. The original story has been rewritten rather drastically. This in itself do not bother me too much. I am not one of those fanatics that get a fart stuck the wrong way if someone messes with the holy bible. However, I really do not think this was a good rewrite. A lot of the magical moments had been removed and that took away a lot from the story.

The movie starts off good enough with some nice and fairly impressive battles. Then it slows down a lot and sometimes I got a “get on with it damn it” feeling. When we finally got around to the burning bush part I got rather underwhelmed. God as a vengeful kid? Come on!

The disasters and the special effects are not too shabby but the entire bit where Moses confronted Ramses and warned him about the disasters that where to befall Egypt are taken out. They where just thrown on Egypt one after another in ways that could be explained away as natural disasters. From one point of view I can understand the wish to do this but to me it took something away from the movie.

Later when Ramses decides to go after the Hebrews it continues in the same way with Ridley Scott downplaying the magic in the story. There is no pillar of fire and Moses is not holding out his staff to split the see. The sea just decided to recede and Moses takes advantage of it. Sure the effects when the water returns where quite cool but again, the magic was gone.

Technically the movie is quite well done and the acting is quite okay but the biblical grandeur and mythical aspects are no longer there. This grand adventure story is simply reduced to an ordinary, fairly mediocre adventure movie with a high budget. I have to say that I enjoyed Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments more even though the special effects in that one is hopelessly outdated and the acting is a bit awkward.

Review By: Per Gunnar Jonsson
Exodus: Effects and Lack of Emotion
It’s not any one thing especially that is particularly so wrong with Exodus: Gods and Kings, but an overall gloom and doom that befalls the film, the deadly serious tone, that keeps it from reaching to a higher plain of epic-filmmaking existence. Scott takes this tale SO seriously, indeed, that he has things like a stern-faced child as the voice of the “I Am”. Which is fine, except that there is nary a moment of any kind of other emotion from this child actor throughout than of whining. At least when Scorsese had a child as a ‘God’-like being in Last Temptation of Christ it was for a shorter period of time, and for a more specific purpose. If there was a point to be made about this child as a “God” – perhaps as his way of criticizing religion as the God of the Old Testament being a brutal eight year-old – it could have had an impact… if the rest of the film around it wasn’t so thuddeningly dull.

Why is this so dull? When you have this much money at your disposal, you got to try to make as much of a HUMAN connection, to make the drama really stand out (this was something another filmmaker in 2014, Aronofsky with Noah, actually understood and really made palpable and intense amid the spectacle). Or, go the other way into broad and campy material. Scott is just there to shoot a lot of this much the way he did Gladiator, Kingdom of Heaven and Robin Hood – in other words, substitute out the pyramids with colisseums, or castles, or other things, and you’d have similar hyper-kinetic action (sometimes but not always too fast) and actors who are well-trained and versed and there to do the work, but not much more.

Actually, those other films, even Robin Hood, would be preferable to sit through again than Exodus. There’s just no joy or excitement to the filmmaking; the closest part where it really gets engaging and exciting and full of ‘Wow’ material are the plagues. Those work well, just as eye-candy. People in the cast like Christian Bale and Joel Edgerton, as Moses and Ramses respectively, are giving it their all – or as much as the script is asking them too, which is pretty similar relatively scene to scene (Ramses rarely is anything other than a “God”-type d***head). But other actors are completely wasted amid the scenery and effects: Sigourney Weaver, Aaron Paul, Ben Kingsley, they’re only there to look on with awe and “huh” moments, or deliver exposition glumly. Ewen Bremmer, of all actors, as the sort of court-jester-summarizer of the plagues steals the show far as supporting players go.

It’s all just flat, monotonous story-telling, and for all of those moments – that mid-section with the plagues – that are visually striking and cool-looking, there’s still not much investment with the characters. We know how this will play out, but what do Scott and his screenwriters do to add anything extra aside from that been-there-done-that “lived-in” dirty quality? Uh… extra violence (albeit just up to the line of R-rated)? An opening battle? For all of the intensity of the two main actors, and the tremendous special effects, it’s practically wasted on a story that is 90 minutes shorter than DeMille’s 1956 Ten Commandments, feels long and sluggishly paced – this despite the fact that certain other characters who could add some human dimension (like Moses’ wife) are underdeveloped and under-utilized. Just put the actor there, prop-like, shoot, go on with the next scene.

Where’s a good ‘Golden Calf’ sequence when you really need one?

Review By: Quinoa1984
Ridley, what were you thinking?
Exodus: Gods and Kings is based on one of the most important stories in the Jewish and Christian traditions. The film begins with Moses (Christian Bale) as an adult. He has been raised as a prince of Egypt, a brother to the future pharaoh, Ramses (Joel Edgerton) and he is a general of the Egyptian army. He has been blessed with leadership qualities and has the respect of the Egyptian nation and his uncle, Seti, the current Pharaoh (John Turturro). After proving himself on the battlefield and a series of events, he is confronted with his actual familial history and the prophecy of his role in the salvation of the Hebrew nation. Due to the death of an Egyptian guard, Moses is exiled from his home country and eventually comes to Midian. He marries and takes on the role of husband, father and shepherd in his adoptive homeland. While chasing stray sheep on Mount Horeb, he is confronted by God who comes to him in the form of a child. He is charged with freeing the Hebrew nation from 400 years of Egyptian slavery. He is chosen because of his leadership qualities and abilities as a general. Leaving behind his family, he goes back to Egypt and confronts Ramses. Moses threatens the Pharaoh with the message from God to free the Hebrews. The Pharaoh’s pride does not allow the slaves to be freed. Moses speaks to the people and trains them for battle. Moses is confronted with the eventual torture of the Hebrew slaves and he wrestles with his ongoing discussions with God. Eventually, due to the lack of response from Ramses, the plagues begin. The powerful nation of Egypt is destroyed through the decimation of it’s water and food sources. Flies, frogs, locusts, boils and darkness plague the nation. When the final plague is to come, Moses goes to his adopted brother and pleads for mercy for his people and the nation of Egypt. Pharaoh does not listen and the horror of the plague occurs falls on the Egyptian people, while the Hebrews are spared the impact of the plagues. The Pharaoh relents and the slaves are set free. They journey out of Egypt, which then sets up the conclusive battle at the Red Sea.          This might be a slight revision of the story that many will know from tradition or Sunday school and church stories. Even with the reliance on good special effects for the retelling of the Biblical narrative, there was not much that could have pull this film out from under a poorly written and executed screenplay. Ridley Scott (Gladiator, Alien) has revised the the story to bring it to the big screen and the question has to be, why? There is always room for artistic license to fill in the gaps of the biblical narrative, but to rewrite the core of the story is inexplicable. The Bible provides a wealth of content for the writers and director, but the artistic license taken was unnecessary. The number of scriptural challenges in this film were innumerable: God depicted as a child, the role of Miriam and Aaron, the management of the plagues and the Moses’ belief in God. There are enough scriptural problems for theologians to tear apart the film for days and there will be a multitude of articles written. Analysing the theological content is not the main point of this review, but some have to be addressed. The notion of Moses as a warrior has a masculine appeal, but even this nuance does not fit in the end. The depiction of God as a spoilt and vindictive child showed the lack of understanding of the story and of God. One of the biggest questions would be, where was Moses’ staff? The staff that God had equipped him with for the sake of delivering the message and leading the people. The staff was not the means of salvation, but it has come to symbolise the message and how God would assist Moses in the delivery of the message and lead his people to the promised land. This detail was missing in the film and epitomised the lack of effort by the screen writers for the finer details in telling the story. Rewriting essential elements of a tale that is so familiar to many around the world will cause an opposition to the believability of this film. Sadly, the drama is provided by God for this epic tale, but in trying to minimise his role in the story takes out the heart of the story and shows Scott’s lack of care to the source material.          Exodus: Gods and Kings will be inevitably compared to Noah and to a lesser degree to Son of God. To have three biblical epics portrayed within a calendar year is unprecedented and the comparisons are hard to avoid. The biggest disappointment with Exodus: Gods and Kings is not the merely the poor usage of the original narrative, but with Ridley Scott. He is a film legend and has directed some of the greatest films in history. His ability to direct is without question, but this film failed beyond Aronofsky’s Noah, because of the poor use of original content. The book of Exodus is full of rich content. With the resources that are available to him, Ridley had the opportunity to put forward an epic film and to redefine the later part of his career, but he did not achieve this with Exodus. If only he had just told the story and added his artistry to fill in the gaps. It could have been great, but this film fell short. For Ridley Scott fans, this film will not put faith back into the work of this master filmmaker. For the fans of God’s story, you will be frustrated by the misrepresentation of the story, but instead of railing against it, reread the account and be ready to clarify what really happened in Egypt with all that go to see this film.
Review By: russellingreviews

Other Information:

Original Title Exodus: Gods and Kings
Release Date 2014-12-03
Release Year 2014

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 30 min (150 min), 2 hr 22 min (142 min) (Taiwan)
Budget 140000000
Revenue 268031828
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Adventure, Drama
Director Ridley Scott
Writer Adam Cooper, Bill Collage, Jeffrey Caine
Actors Christian Bale, Joel Edgerton, Ben Kingsley
Country United Kingdom, Spain, United States
Awards 5 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Atmos, Dolby Surround 7.1, Datasat, Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Red Epic Dragon, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses (helicopter shots 2D), Red Epic M-X
Laboratory Company 3, London, UK (digital intermediate), Fluent Image, London, UK (digital negative management)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format Redcode RAW
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Redcode RAW (5K) (dual-strip 3-D) (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema (also 3-D version)

Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Exodus: Gods and Kings 2014 123movies
Original title Exodus: Gods and Kings
TMDb Rating 5.827 4,049 votes

Similar titles

The Girl on the Train 2016 123movies
Open Range 2003 123movies
Babel 2006 123movies
Bolden 2019 123movies
Avenging Angelo 2002 123movies
Adam’s Apples 2005 123movies
The Small World of Sammy Lee 1963 123movies
The Accidental Spy 2001 123movies
Jodi 2021 123movies
Three Brothers 1981 123movies
Tree House Time Machine 2018 123movies
Inner City Rats 2019 123movies