ChromeSkull: Laid to Rest 2 2011 123movies

Watch: ChromeSkull: Laid to Rest 2 2011 123movies, Full Movie Online – “ChromeSkull” is the sequel to the 2009 horror hit “Laid to Rest.” It brings back ChromeSkull, who barely escaped death in the first movie and is hell-bent on continuing where he left off… and forging a new path of terror and destruction..
Plot: The game of cat-and-mouse is on as Chromeskull’s assistant, Preston, scrambles to tie up the loose ends left behind after his deranged boss’s last killing spree. He finds that he likes taking care of business—maybe a little too much. One bloody mess leads to another and the bodies pile up in a visual feast of the most spectacular kills ever filmed.
Smart Tags: #sequel #masked_killer #serial_killer #returning_character_with_different_actor #murder #kidnapping #coffin #dead_woman_dragged #police_officer_stabbed #gun_in_mouth #suicide_by_gunshot #death_of_expectant_mother #death_of_pregnant_woman #scene_after_end_credits #decapitation #stabbed_in_the_head #breast_removal #shower #gore #pregnant_woman_commits_suicide #suicide_of_pregnant_woman

Find Alternative – ChromeSkull: Laid to Rest 2 2011, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	5.0/10 Votes: 3,843
	N/A | RottenTomatoes
	N/A | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 83 Popularity: 8.389 | TMDB

Reviews:

An extremely gory but ultimately disappointing sequel.
I know that I enjoyed the original Laid to Rest for its sheer enthusiasm and spectacularly OTT gore, but I can recall very little about the actual plot, despite having only seen it a year ago; perhaps that’s because there wasn’t much of a story to remember in the first place (the lack of strong narrative clearly didn’t matter too much to me: I gave the first film a rating of 7.5/10).

Chromeskull: Laid to Rest 2 is just as eager to please in terms of bloody mayhem, and does so brilliantly with oodles of really mean-spirited and excellently executed gore, but this time around the film-makers also try to build on Chromeskull’s character, and it is here that the film comes apart quicker than one of the killer’s victims. While a bit of back-story mightn’t have been so bad, what we are presented with here is so overblown, convoluted, and incomprehensible that it only serves to confuse and irritate in the extreme.

The film opens abruptly with no recap of previous events, immediately launching into the unnecessarily complex nonsense that passes for a plot, in which a secret organisation is revealed to be behind the work of our metal mask-wearing maniac. With a script even messier than one of Chromeskull’s kills, the viewer is simply left with too many unanswered questions—Who are these characters? What is the nefarious organisation hoping to achieve? Why are the police so f•••ing inept? Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to hire Danielle Harris (she was in the extremely disappointing sequel to Hatchet too!)? It all adds up to a very frustrating and frankly rather tedious experience.

If director Robert Hall proceeds with his intended third and final Laid to Rest film, I really hope that he succeeds in explaining matters in a satisfying manner; simply drenching proceedings with buckets of really nasty knife action just won’t cut it next time.

I rate Chromeskull: Laid to Rest 2 a 9/10 for the sterling work of the effects guys, but 1/10 for everything else (resulting in a disappointing average of 5/10).

Not as good as the first but an OKAY sequel with less umph
Short and sweet, with no spoilers.

As noted in other reviews, the movie picks up where part one ended, but quickly goes another direction, as we find out Chromeskull has an entire team of people working for him. Again, as many reviews note, this is hard to believe, and a bit of a personal letdown, but I won’t trash it like others. At the end of the day, I don’t judge movies on whether they are realistic, as I take what I’m fed and go from there. Most serial killer/slasher flicks are unrealistic, so why wrestle with a plot over its “this could never happen” facets?

I put this movie in the “JUST O.K.” boat. I came for the blood and gore, not superb storyline or acting, and in this respect it was fine. Due to working on intercharacter relationships, however, some of the intensity was lost, as well as the consistency of “kills,” if that makes sense.

***NOTE: So I like blood and guts horror. Sue me.

But I digress.

Personally, I feel like the storyline tried to do too much for a formulaic slasher flick. I liked the original, as it wasn’t about notable actors or personal relationships other than the people involved. With Brian Austin Green’s inclusion, part 2 felt a bit contrived, as if attempting to find validation for the script. Besides the fact that he doesn’t play a convincing maniacal killer, the beauty of part 1 is that the story doesn’t rely on anything but sheer slashing. BAG was completely unnecessary and could have been played by any old chump and it wouldn’t have mattered to me. Though, any time I see Danielle Harris, I’m happy.

Anyway…beyond this bit of beef, it was ok. The pace is different, since we already know what Chromeface does, and the story takes precedent over kills. At the end of the day, there just wasn’t enough “meat” to take it from “just ok” to “good.”

The production was on par with part 1. Shot on professional equipment, decent acting (but for BAG), editing, etc…all about the same as the original. Special fx remained decent as well.

All in all, if you watched the first one and enjoyed it, you’ll be ok with the sequel (I hear there’s another one in development…with BAG. Ugh), just don’t expect quite as much. Not a total let down, but I think the writer just tried to do too much.

Notes on Parental Contact:
* There is a fair amount of profanity. At least as much as part 1, if not more.
* I would not call this a scary movie, but there are several scenes that could be described as “intense.”
* Brief partial nudity but sex and sexual content is not a prevailing theme.
* Violence and gore is what most people would call “severe.” As noted above, there are fewer killings in part 2 but the ones we do see are no less gory than the first. If you’re a gorehound like me, it’s fine. Lots of blood & violence with a smattering of gore for good measure.

For those who call this a terrible movie because the story is fake or the acting isn’t Oscar worthy, why would you expect this to begin with? It’s a straight-up slasher flick for the modern horror buff. Yes…they tried to add some “Saw”-like elements, but come on…what movie doesn’t borrow from another these days.

So, if you watched the first, then you should see the second. Just know it’s lost a bit of umph. Still worth the watch, just take what you’re fed and go with it.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 33 min (93 min)
Budget 0
Revenue 0
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Horror
Director Robert Hall
Writer Kevin Bocarde, Robert Hall
Actors Brian Austin Green, Thomas Dekker, Mimi Michaels
Country United States
Awards 1 nomination
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix N/A
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera N/A
Laboratory N/A
Film Length N/A
Negative Format N/A
Cinematographic Process N/A
Printed Film Format N/A