300: Rise of an Empire 2014 123movies

Watch: 300: Rise of an Empire 2014 123movies, Full Movie Online – After its victory over Leonidas’ 300, the Persian Army under the command of Xerxes marches towards the major Greek city-states. The Democratic city of Athens, first on the path of Xerxes’ army, bases its strength on its fleet, led by admiral Themistocles. Themistocles is forced to an unwilling alliance with the traditional rival of Athens, oligarchic Sparta whose might lies with its superior infantry troops. But Xerxes still reigns supreme in numbers over sea and land..
Plot: Greek general Themistocles attempts to unite all of Greece by leading the charge that will change the course of the war. Themistocles faces the massive invading Persian forces led by mortal-turned-god, Xerxes and Artemesia, the vengeful commander of the Persian navy.
Smart Tags: #good_versus_evil #seductress #female_nudity #removing_clothes_from_someone #woman_moans_from_pleasure #greek #army #navy #antiquity #5th_century_b.c. #ancient_greece #historical_fiction #violent_sex #father_son_relationship #xerxes #aeschylus #kiss_on_the_lips #lust #thrusting #stripping #shouting_during_sex

Find Alternative – 300: Rise of an Empire 2014, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	6.2/10 Votes: 301,870
	45% | RottenTomatoes
	48/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 5738 Popularity: 63.5 | TMDB

Reviews:

Thought this movie was pretty good when I wasn’t expecting too much from the bad ratings and reviews I’d seen. I was pleasantly surprised at the storyline, and the visuals and battle scenes were pretty epic. Overall I would say this is worth a watch but don’t expect too much from the film. The original is better but this is a worthy follow up.

This is one of these movies which will always have its detractors because it is not historically correct. There are certain movies in which you expect a certain amount of historical accuracy and there are certain movies where you do not. This is one of the latter. You must be out of your mind if you ever expected any great deal of historical accuracy from this movie (or any Hollywood production nowadays for that matter). Therefore it pains me to see the reviews that slams this movie with a one-star rating and moans about how it is screwing with the (their) history. I would certainly not call this a great movie but, as a movie, it is far from the one-star range.

The movie is watchable, it is even somewhat enjoyable to watch but it is not really a great and epic movie. There are lots of action which is one of the good parts. Some of the scenery, especially the naval ones, are quite magnificent even though they are somewhat overdone in the usual Hollywood way. The bow waves make these heavy, wooden, oar-powered ships look like they are speeding ahead at 30 knots for instance.

The action is of the rather gory and blood splattering type. Given all the slow motion scenes with copious amounts of blood slowly floating in the air I would assume this was more out of intention than out of ignorance although the ease by which these ancient swords chopped through bones and necks seemed rather unbelievable. I do not mind blood and gore in my movies but I have to say that the blood and gore in this movie seemed to have taken precedence over the rest of the creative process.

The movie simply failed to inspire the awe that one would expect an epic movie of this type would do. Someone said that the movie played out a lot like a video game and to some extent that is true. I never really felt much for any of the characters when watching the movie. I found myself just waiting for the next action scene. The enjoyable part of this movie is really the action, the scenery and the effects, not the story or the characters.

The movie is watchable, even enjoyable depending on your expectations but far from great.

An insult to history and viewers pockets
It was not even a waste of time because i got time to review mentally the real history of the Battle of marathon whilst dying watching this 3D movie. Firstly, I am tired of the dualism that Hollywood tries to portray when producing these movies: good vs bad. Portrays Greeks as clean, democratic, free civilization,… OK, but always vs dirty, vain, bloody Persians…!!! All that to get viewers to lean towards what they have to judge is good or wrong (america – middle east…). The movie does not portrays a single thing that was real at that time, not even the boats, …neither, obviously, Artemisa who “represents”a Goddess. Overall, I am not even sure I want to write much about this movie. In fact the chopping hands, heads, blood and bad 3D are representative of what I thought it was an old style of making movies, probably addressed to -sorry- ignorant viewers or those who are satisfied with bloody movies regardless of how misleading they can be. Don’t watch it, a waste of time and waste of money….

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 42 min (102 min)
Budget 110000000
Revenue 337580051
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Action, Drama
Director Noam Murro
Writer Zack Snyder, Kurt Johnstad, Frank Miller
Actors Sullivan Stapleton, Eva Green, Lena Headey
Country United States
Awards 2 wins & 7 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix SDDS, Datasat, Dolby Digital, Dolby Atmos, Dolby Surround 7.1
Aspect Ratio 2.35 : 1
Camera Red Epic, Zeiss Master Prime and Fujinon Alura Lenses
Laboratory Company 3, Los Angeles (CA), USA (digital intermediate), DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA (color), FotoKem Laboratory, Burbank (CA), USA (nextLAB dailies), Technicolor, Hollywood (CA), USA (prints)
Film Length 2,782 m (Spain), 2,811 m (6 reels)
Negative Format Redcode RAW
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Redcode RAW (5K) (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic) (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema (also 3-D version)