Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 2008 123movies

Watch: Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 2008 123movies, Full Movie Online – Academic freedom is being suppressed, says Ben Stein. He contends that professors from around the United States are being fired from their jobs for promoting, or even exploring the possibility of, intelligent design as an alternative to Darwinism. Stein interviews the expelled academics and other supporters of intelligent design. He also interviews the scientists in the mainstream, who support Darwinism. Stein links Darwinism to Nazism, Communism, eugenics and abortion. Vintage clips of educational films and Hollywood movies are used to illustrate points in a satirical way..
Plot: Pro-intelligent design scholars and scientists are often chastised, fired or denied tenured positions by those who believe in Darwin’s theory of evolution.
Smart Tags: #darwinism #evolution #cutting_oneself_with_one’s_fingernails #propaganda #creationism #intelligent_design #academic_freedom #eugenics #christian_fundamentalism #paranoia #reference_to_zeus_the_greek_deity #scientist #author #academia #science #website #united_states_of_america #tenure #slot_machine #skeptic #skepticism

Find Alternative – Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 2008, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	3.7/10 Votes: 12,092
	11% | RottenTomatoes
	20/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 58 Popularity: 4.963 | TMDB

Reviews:

Silly me for thinking this might actually be good…
Since reviews of this film are pretty much split right down the political divide, I suppose I should stress that I’m neither a Christian nor an atheist (although you might call me a curious agnostic who usually votes Republican), and have no emotional stake in ID or evolution. I WANTED this film to be interesting, enlightening and thought provoking. Sadly, it wasn’t. I hoped that there would be intelligent arguments presented from both sides. There weren’t ANY from either side. People keep mentioning that the main point of the film is a defense of academic freedom, not to prove ID or disprove Darwinism. But its ‘defense’ of academic freedom was every bit as contemptuous towards evolutionary science as is the behavior of the current scientific community towards ID. Are we really to believe that if the roles were flipped and intelligent design were the predominant ideology taught in classrooms, that ID supporters would allow Darwinists equal time? Just look at the reactions given by the comments being posted on this forum by people who, miraculously, found this film to be praiseworthy. ID supporters, like all ideologues, want equal time only until they achieve power. Perhaps evolutionists are the same way, though one of the examples of ‘discrimination’ given in this film has already been proved false. A waste of a fascinating topic, a waste of time, a waste of money. If this kind of film making is the fruit of Michael Moore’s legacy, then he and Stein both should be shot for crimes against cinema.

Deceitful “documentary”
I don’t know if this movie could even be considered a legitimate documentary. The movie is filmed with interjected scenes of Nazi war camps while the interviews are taking place. Apparently Ben Stein blames the holocaust on science and uses this to support his view against evolution. The entire “documentary” is misleading, he rarely shows any subtext of who he is talking to or make mention of any of their accreditation. Ignoring this, Ben never actually makes any real scientific points at all during the entire film. He never even stumps or even makes it appear that he has stumped a scientists anywhere in this film.

Apparently, Mr. Stein’s entire objective of this film is to convey no real science (not there there is any in ID to begin with) but rather to preach out about free speech and how we should “teach the controversy”. However, there is no real controversy, the “controversy” was already sorted out decades ago. I guess this means we should teach alchemy AFTER the discovery of chemistry because some backwards, ignorant, bronze age people from a time capsule still think alchemy is viable science.

Creationism’s explanation for the unexplained is that of supernatural. However, by definition supernatural is unknown. So what the film is really saying is: we cannot explain X with current knowledge, therefore, X = supernatural = unknown (why is there a middle term there?). Just because theory A may not explain X does not mean that theory B automatically explains X.

Disregarding everything that I have mentioned above, the movie is still directed poorly, uses cheesy clips and doesn’t flow well.

It is a terrible and misleading movie.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 37 min (97 min), 1 hr 30 min (90 min) (USA), 1 hr 37 min (97 min) (European Film Market) (Germany)
Budget 3500000
Revenue 7700000
Status Released
Rated PG
Genre Documentary
Director Nathan Frankowski
Writer Kevin Miller, Ben Stein
Actors Ben Stein, Lili Asvar, Peter Atkins
Country United States
Awards 3 wins
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera N/A
Laboratory N/A
Film Length N/A
Negative Format N/A
Cinematographic Process N/A
Printed Film Format 35 mm