Watch: L’Enfant sauvage 1970 123movies, Full Movie Online – 1798. In a forest, some countrymen catch a wild child who can not walk, speak, read nor write. Doctor Itard is interested by the child, and starts to educate him. Everybody thinks he will fail, but with a lot of love and patience, he manages to obtain results and the child continues with normal development. This is based on true story..
Plot: In 1798, a feral boy is discovered outside the town of Aveyron, France. Diagnosed as mentally impaired, he is relegated to an asylum. A young doctor named Jean Itard becomes convinced that the boy has normal mental capacity, but that his development was hindered by lack of contact with society. He brings the boy home and begins an arduous attempt at education over several years.
Smart Tags: #education #countryside #child_nudity #doctor #feral_child #alphabet_letter #milk #runaway_child #aveyron_france #housekeeper #school_for_the_deaf #forest #voice_over #no_opening_credits #18th_century #abandoned_child #tree_climbing #hunting_dog #burrow #smoke #barn
123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day
7.5/10 Votes: 8,385 | |
100% | RottenTomatoes | |
94/100 | MetaCritic | |
N/A Votes: 249 Popularity: 7.927 | TMDB |
Truffaut asks the question through a dramatic narrative- can humanity be brought out through science?
The Wild Child could be the kind of movie that doesn’t work. In a way it’s hard to find what the dramatic conflict of the film would be if not for the push & pull struggle between the scientists and his ‘test’ subject of sorts, Victor, the wild child of the title. But somehow it does- Truffaut laces the film with a kind of undertone of logic for the audience (how can a boy for most of his life be out in the wild and become suddenly domesticated), while making a sort of nature versus society statement. The film also has the director’s trademark lightness, which helps to not make the film’s subject matter too bleak or disparaging. For it could be- Truffaut actually gives a kind of suspense to the narrative at times, that just when you think Victor is on his way to success, he stumbles and starts to act out on the floor or escape into the wild for a breather. It’s a very curious film, not just because Truffaut (in one of his few times) gives himself the starring role, but also that the child- like Makim Munzak in Kurosawa’s Dersu Uzala- had his only significant role ever in the film. And it’s quite the seemingly impulsive, and always alive, performance that filmmaker’s rarely get out of children.Victor is named this only halfway through the film, and it starts off with him being chased by a small mob and their dogs through the woods. It’s maybe the most exciting part of the film, but then this segways into the early stages of the boy’s troubles. He’s placed in a deaf and dumb school, beat up by the other kids, and still with the passions and intelligence that the woods have given him. It becomes a fascination in the story of what the limits, if any, are for him to learn everything real boys do. Once he’s put into Dr. Itard’s (Truffaut) care, then the film sets off onto a very direct path- how will he learn, will he, and how long will it it take? As with his other films, the literary aspect kicks in as the scientist takes repeated notes on the boy, using a kind of pre-Darwinian way of scientific methods. But it’s within the little moments in the film, like when Victor is out on his walks, or makes his little successes, where Truffaut as a filmmaker picks up the best parts of the film.
This could be a very routine picture, and for some it may actually be a little dull and disheartening. Will the boy ever learn? The film actually does raise questions within its format, as it is based on a true case (from taking science classes I know there are also others of this kind as well). It brings to mind about what is pure and delicate about the ways of an animal and what separates them and humans. Each little test becomes dramatic conflict in the structure Truffaut puts forth, and in a way it’s rather experimental. And it even becomes delightful in certain scenes, like when he first learns how to ask for milk, and then this expands. This, along with a sweet Vivaldi score in the background, and interesting visuals (love the iris usage), makes it a worthwhile entry in Truffaut’s oeuvre. Not one of his absolute best, but up there.
A true story
This austere ,black and white movie might be Truffaut’s peak.Recalling sometimes,in its spirit,Penn’s “miracle worker”,the work suffuses with humanism,belief in dignity of man .The child ,for Truffaut,is a frail human being,who needs (and deserves ) education.Hence,some critics called “wild child” the positive side of “the 400 blows”.Perhaps so,but ,in my humble opinion,the 1969 effort is much stronger than the rather academic first attempt.Following Doctor Itard’s report with absolute fidelity,and portraying him with gusto,Truffaut is a much better actor here than he ‘s in Spielberg’s “close encounters”.The production is pared down to the essential,using old-fashioned techniques,recalling silent movies.I do not think,like M.Maltin,that it “loses steam half-way through”.On the contrary,the most important scene in the whole movie comes in the last third:Victor,the wild child ,unfairly punished,rebels.He can see the difference between good and bad.Might it be possible that moral conscience should be innate? Does society,as Rousseau believed it pervert man? At the beginning of the movie,remember how cruel was our civilized populace to the different child: showed in public,like a queer animal,to make dough. All teachers in the world should see this masterpiece.NB:In France,in primary school,a lot of pupils read Victor’s story.
Original Language fr
Runtime 1 hr 23 min (83 min)
Budget 0
Revenue 0
Status Released
Rated G
Genre Biography, Drama, History
Director François Truffaut
Writer François Truffaut, Jean Gruault, Jean Itard
Actors François Truffaut, Jean-Pierre Cargol, Françoise Seigner
Country France
Awards 4 wins & 3 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A
Sound Mix Mono
Aspect Ratio 1.66 : 1
Camera N/A
Laboratory N/A
Film Length 2,314 m (Italy)
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm